Category: (DVD)
26 new, starting at $5.99
36 used, starting at $3.18
JOANNA EBERHART HAS COME TO THE QUAINT LITTLE TOWN OF STEPFORD, CONNECTICUT WITH HER FAMILY, BUT SOON DISCOVERS THERE LIES ASINISTER TRUTH IN THE ALL TOO PERFECT BEHAVIOR OF THE FEMALERESIDENTS.
Ira Levin's scary novel about forced conformity in a small Connecticut town made for this compelling 1975 thriller. Katharine Ross stars as a city woman who moves with her husband to Stepford and is startled by how perpetually happy many of the local women seem to be. Her search for an answer reveals a plot to replace troublesome real wives with more accommodating fake ones (not unlike the alien takeover in Invasion of the Body Snatchers). The closer she gets to the truth, the more danger she faces--not to mention the likelihood that the men in town intend to replace her as well. Screenwriter William Goldman (Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid) and director Bryan Forbes (King Rat) made this a taut, tense semiclassic with a healthy dose of satiric wit. --Tom Keogh
Classic thrillerReviewed by Franklin Godfrey, 2009-10-14
I saw this, for the first time, within the
last 2 years, and I agree: It is a well done
shocker. Katharine Ross and Paula Prentiss
are excellent in the lead actress roles.
I thought Patrick O'Neal as the head of the
'men's association' and the actress who plays
the psychiatrist who Ross has an appointment
with are also standouts. Nanette Newman,
Peter Masterson, Franklin Cover (who also
played a character in "The Jeffersons" TV
series) and the rest of the cast all give
good performances.
Great place to move to...Reviewed by Michael Valdivielso, 2009-01-22
Stepford is a great place to live. Clean air. Good schools. Happy,
smiling people having pool parties, being nice and making lots of
brownies. The movie is legend and while everybody knows what is
going to happen you still can't help but enjoy the thrill as Joanna
slowly solves the mystery of the town. And by doing so ends up the
next victim.
The DVD has trailers, interviews and bios. A must, new or used.
Newshawk DVDsReviewed by The Newshawk, 2008-12-24
I remembered that the original "Stepford Wives" movie had been a
great and fairly scary picture, so I bought the newer version on
DVD a few years ago -- and was very disappointed. The newer version
just didn't capture the mood or tone of the original. That DVD went
went into a cardboard box filled with other of my "lesser"
DVDs.
A few weeks ago, I was going through that box to determine which
DVDs I would keep and which ones I would give or trade away.
When I came across my copy of the newer "Stepford Wives." I put
into my discard box. Then, for some reason, I decided to keep it --
and order a DVD of my beloved original "The Stepford Wives" and
some other DVDs.
When my order was delivered I watched the original for the first
time in many years. It was just as I remembered, It was still the
great movie even if it didn't seem as scary as I remembered. The
acting, lighting and mood was wonderful, especially since it was in
black and white It was thrilling -- and without the gore every few
minutes that seem to be required by
so many modern movies to create thrills and chills.
A few days later I decided to watch the newer "Stepford Wives." As
I watched the DVD I realized I was watching the same movie and,
while the mood was so different from the original, it was a
delightful movie. The colors added the tone of the movie and I
realized I was watching an almost-satire of the original. It was an
inspired version of the original without a fault, especially with
the casting. The light touch was perfect.
Now, instead of loving just one movie, I have two versions of the
same and two favorite movies to watch to my heart's content.
The Stepford Wives is an American ClassicReviewed by Mr. Steven K. Weller, 2008-08-27
I love this film. This is film-making at its American Classic best.
There is so much depth to this film. And the subtleties are
amazing. I've seen it more than once and it really does have a lot
of layers. Maybe, as a previous review indicated, it seems
slow-paced compared to the movies we're accustomed to seeing now.
However, if you watch closely there are a lot of things that are
revealed but not underscored in a heavy-handed fashion. Joanna
insists her husband finish doing the dishes as she does other
kitchen chores. Joanna is asked if she's ever made it in front of a
fireplace by her husband and she replies "Not with you." Joanna was
a strong and opinionated woman, and that obviously grated on her
weak-willed husband. The reasons he loved her to being with are
also the reasons he plots to replace her.
I also really enjoyed the documentary that sheds some light on the
behind-the-scenes casting and writing issues, such as learning
Diane Keaton was originally to play Joanna but dropped out, and
master-screenwriter William Goldman wrote a draft of the script and
fought with producers and was fired.
To me, the plot's seemingly slow pace actually furthers the central
theme - one way or another, moving to Stepford is going to envelop
Joanna either like quicksand or the more horrifying ultimate truth.
Joanna even unwittingly contributes to her own demise, allowing
herself to be studied by the guys from the Mens' Association. By
the time Joanna realizes what is happening, it is too late.
I tend to think of this film as more of a European film in some
ways, rather than 1970's style filmmaking, because they don't do
blatant exposition. They allow the viewer to see the clues and
arrive at their own conclusion. It is a matter of treating the
audience's intelligence with respect.
Nicely drawn allegorical suspense movieReviewed by Bruno, 2008-05-25
This film certainly deserves to be rated a classic for the imprint
it has left on popular culture alone. Everybody knows what a
Stepford Wife is even if most people haven't seen the film. And as
a straightforward suspense horror it belongs in the premier league.
Perhaps a little slow in the first half but more than making up for
it in the second.
In terms of its message, I found it wasn't so easy to interpret. Is
it simply, as others here suggest, an allegory parodying the
resentment felt by men after the first feminist revolutions of the
60's? Of course we are supposed to identify with the women in the
story and especially the lead heroine, the suspense and drama of
the film wouldn't work at all otherwise. But perhaps we are
entitled to feel a little bit of empathy with the menfolk of
Stepford and their motivations. In particular the poor Walter,
stressed to the hilt through working non-stop to provide for his
children only for his self-indulgent wife to pursue her egotistical
and vain dreams of becoming a famous photographer. Is the allegory
more subtle - are we really looking at the disorientation of men,
and are the Stepford wives merely experiencing what it feels like
to have your identity, expectations and certainties overturned
almost over night?
Actually, I'm inclined to see the film as merely a well made
satirical portent of the possible dangers of a vengeful male
backlash against the recently won gains of feminism. It must be
remembered that in the 1970's it wasn't clear at all what the
eventual outcome of the great gender war would be. Most of the men
in the film are cold, calculating and evil. The only sympathetic
male character is Walter and he comes across as much of a
manipulated victim to the 'Men's Association' as the women do. Any
feminist should delight in the carefully charicatured mysogny on
display, from the mens' 'objectifying' picture drawing to the
dismissal of the lead character's conspiracy paranoia as merely an
over emotional hissy fit.
We now know that womenkind decisively won the 20th century sex war,
unless or until Islam one day re-takes the west for the forces of
patriarchy. The ending of the film, where all the women parade
contentedly around the supermarket aisles with their trolleys, so
dutiful and robotic that they do not even get sexually distracted
at the sight of a black man, must strike most 21st century viewers
as both unbelivable and kitschy.
But perhaps the dream of having women who once again accept their
natural place in society (without having to resort to a neolithic
religion) is not so fanciful after all. Feminism arrived late in
Japan - it's first devasting effects (breakdown of the family,
spiralling youth delinquency, horrendous abortion rates, the
progressive retardation of the arts and sciences etc) are only just
being felt and the first anti-feminist backlash only just
beginning. But whilst Japan is behind the west in the social
effects of feminism, it is years ahead of the west in terms of
robotics. The most advaced and life like androids in the world were
recently unveiled at a science fair in Tokyo - they can talk - very
politely. They will do whatever their male inventors and
programmers tell them to do. They are beautiful...and they are
female...